What were the causes and effects of shays rebellion. 1. Discuss the Causes and Consequences of Shay’s Rebellion in Massachusetts in 1786 2019-03-10
What were the causes and effects of shays rebellion Rating:
9,7/10
262
reviews
Shays Rebellion
If it hadn't happened at such a crucial time in our country's history it would have been put down immediately, and no one would ever have. Instead, they returned home from war to find they were in massive debt. The rebellion described above did not occur in 1776, nor did it involve Great Britain. The United States had its new system of government. Shays' Rebellion Imagine you'd sacrificed your time and energy, as well as left your farm and family, to fight for your country's independence.
Many were deeply in debt and were facing serious legal penalties that included prison. Daniel Shays reasoned that his farm could not be taken away by the court if there was no court. First, the federal government recognized that Shays had a legitimate complaint and within a year of the end of Shays' Rebellion they had pardoned most men involved, including Shays. This made the state leaders decided that there needed to be a change to the federal government. A real constitution was needed, that created a larger government and gave it more power. The Ability to express what we think.
They could not pay their taxes, and they were afraid of going to jail or having their homes taken away from them. The farmers of Western Massachusetts were suffering and their taxes were unreasonably high. The significance of Shays' Rebellion has been viewed differently by historians of different time periods. Having disbanded the Continental army, Congress was unable to stop them. Several hundred participants were later indicted on a range charges relating to the rebellion. Having taken part in the Northampton protest, Daniel Shays quickly gained followers. The government in Boston refused to take action, since the money the farmers owed were needed to pay back European investors who had helped finance the American Revolution.
What was the cause of Shays’ Rebellion? A. Daniel Shays was opposed to the Articles of Confederation
Farmers did not have enough money to pay for their taxes, since the states called for heavy taxation so that the country would be out of debt as soon as possible. Then they marched on the national arsenal at Springfield to seize the weapons stored there. The state militia could not put down the rebellion because the farmers were the militia. It indicated that a strong, constitutionally designed nationalgovernment was needed to protect property and maintain order. The government, under the Articles of Confederation, could do nothing about Shays' Rebellion. The Massachusetts State Government was considered by its citizens to be exceptionally unfair in its trade and tariff regulation.
He would be unanimously elected as the nation's first president as well, an office created specifically for him by the convention. The first edition of Samuel Johnson's dictionary was published in 1755. In the time period before Shays Rebellion the Articles of Confederation were used to create a formal, limited authority for the wartime central government that at first was conducted informally by the Continental Congress. The farmers in question—led by the very revolutionaries who had fought against such taxes in the American war for independence—were rebelling against taxes imposed by the state government of Massachusetts. At the local level, farmers were struggling. Between the years of 1786 to 1787, Daniel Shays, a Massachusetts farmer and a Revolutionary War veteran, amassed over 5,000 bankrupt farmers and organized a rebellion against a sovereign Massachusetts State Government. Articles of Confederation: The Articles of Confederation was the original constitution of the United States, which essentially gave states legal authority over its citizens.
But, in early 1785—perhaps anticipating trouble ahead—he resigned his post, claiming poor health. Led by Daniel Shays, a hero of the Battle of Bunker Hill, Massachusetts farmers rebelled. As an alternative view it must be noted. The powers of the national government under the Articles were limited and ineffectual. Hamilton, a strong believer in an elitist-government, would have opposed the rebellion simply because he would not have thought that the Shaysites were any different from the rest of the public who are uninformed and prone to acting out of their own passions.
Here is where Article 1, Section 8 came to be, this gave the congress the ability to. Moreover, it changed the opinion of those delegates who had been arguing on behalf of the more limited powers of government under the Articles of Confederation. Daniel Shay took the lead by training the farmers as an armypulling from his experience in the Revolution and they beganclosing the courts by force so on more of the farmers would triesand jail. Ifthe debts were caused by helping the American Revolution, then itrequired a national solution. At the time the states had very little federal backing and were unable to deal with crisis such as this on their own. In 1786 and 1787, the government was still using the Articles of Confederation as its main laws.
What Was the Cause and Effect of Shays' Rebellion?
He raised a militia and led an uprising. As the Massachusetts State Government hiked in tariff rates, allowed permission to do so by the Articles of Confederation, neighboring states refused to engage in trade relations as a result of the astronomical tariffs enforced by the Massachusetts State Government. Facing mounting debt, the potential for losing everything they had or even imprisonment for debt, they asked the Massachusetts legislature for debt relief. To make up for the loss of revenue, they called for the abolition of aristocratic branches of the government in Boston. Along with insurmountable commercial debt, unusually high tax rates in Massachusetts added to the financial woes of the farmers. A crostick is a poem that forms a vertical word from the first letters of each line. Any actions that were popular and demanded law changes were often put down by the national leaders.
The governor of Massachusetts, James Bowdoin, organized a militia led by General Benjamin Lincoln which quickly crushed the rebellion in the winter of 1787. Actually, the term Shays' Rebellion applied to this last act is inaccurate. Many had their homes seized by the courts, while others were arrested. The Rebellion was quickly defeated, but people realized that the government had to change. Shay's Rebellion brought a massive change to the government. When the government ignored these pleas, many farms were seized and farmers who could not pay their debts were imprisoned.
