Proponents of the Patriot Act believe that it helps maintain and protect national security, while those opposing the Patriot Act believe it runs afoul of the Fourth Amendment. Al-Hussayen was acquitted of all terrorism charges Weigel 2005. This act brought back the feeling of security to citizens one way or the other. Controversy reigned as Congress debated whether or not to make the Patriot Act permanent. Its goals were to strengthen the power of law-enforcement agencies and the domestic securities. This can be traumatic for some visitors and immigrants who just want to experience what it is to be in the land of opportunity. Information sharing is the process of government agencies freely sharing all information and evidence between them.
By this time, a number of legal challenges had been raised, although most continued to languish within the court system. Additionally, the practice of sharing any and all evidence or information between government agencies referred to as information sharing has become legal Abramson and Godoy. Prevent Attacks More Quickly If the investigating officers uncover any sort of malfeasance or a planned attack, then they are able to strike quickly, snuffing out a nascent threat before it has a chance to become full blown. The bill before me accounts for the new realities and dangers posed by modern terrorists. Are you a true survivalist, knowing what to do in an emergency? With the unlimited scope of roving wiretaps, all Americans inadvertently subject themselves to being observed by the government. In the years that followed, however, we began to question whether the Patriot Act provided too much government interference with too few checks and balances.
That, in return, could protect communities from the threat of terror. The viewpoints on this subject are divergent and will be discussed in length. Thus, these opponents claim that the Patriot Act allows for the potential abuse of personal Fourth Amendment rights by allowing wiretapping and records gathering too easily and unreasonably. This was something we never thought would happen again after Pearl Harbor, to be attacked on our own land. The investigation involved more than a dozen organizations working together jointly to detain Faris. This is information that citizens have the constitutional right to keep private, yet the government is effortlessly obtaining it. The Act has been amended severally.
The detention of enemy combatants serves at least two vital purposes. This act expanded Sean P. Detractors argue that the Patriot Act is not lawful and needs to be stricken from the record books. Inclusion is the educational approach that requires students with disabilities to learn together with non-disabled students. The Patriot Act was signed by President Bush on September 19, 2001 and put into use on October 26, 2001. List of Advantages of the Patriot Act 1.
Bush at signing of Patriot Act, 2001. Part of the Patriot Act includes allowing victims of computer hackers to request for law enforcement assistance to track down hackers. Also, this has given power to the Attorney General to decide on the fate of immigrants. Life begins with a cell. One of the provisions of the Patriot Act is the opportunity for grandparents to apply for special immigrant status in order to take care of the children orphaned as a result of terrorism. In effect, if an immigrant is suspected of terrorism and the country he or she comes from refuses to take this person in, the United States government can detain this individual for as long as it wants. Office of the Press Secretary.
This means that millions of lives have been saved by this regulation. Every state handles what method they want to use to put a person to death according to their state laws. Women are nurturing by nature. The document is over three hundred forty pages in length and affected over fifteen statutes. This act expanded the surveillance powers of domestic law enforcement and international intelligence agencies. Data mining is a process in which massive amounts of information on American citizens are collected by looking at internet history to determine personal information such as political affiliation and sexual orientation among other personal factoids as well as tracking the location of citizens.
This way, other citizens will not reveal personal or condemning information unwittingly. When we adopt the principle of universality we adhere to the premise: if an action is right or wrong for others, it is right or wrong for us as well. After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, our country had no choice but to develop new techniques to combat terrorism. Also, this controversial act has put some unsuspecting tourists to shame when they are asked to step aside as they go through immigration. This paper will cover three primary areas to provide a proper public safety case analysis.
The letter is a type of administrative subpoena granting access to medical and financial data, as well as data from travel agencies, casinos, automobile rental agencies, and library records. Because terrorists require financing to accomplish their goals, one of the primary points of focus was placed on domestic and international banking systems. Another flaw of the Act is the provision on immigration where immigrants who are suspected of terrorism can be held and detained indefinitely. Wrongful Imprisonment While the Patriot Act was put into place to stop terrorism, it has had a nasty after math. The government has been issuing national security letters and using them as law enforcement tools since the 1970s. However, security and privacy are quite clearly inversely proportional. Pro yes, for, good Con no, against, bad 1.
This law was passed to prevent another event of terrorist attacks such as the ones that took place on September 11, 2001 in New York City and Washington, D. In this paper, our learning team will discuss the many pros and cons of the Patriot Act of 2001. This ensures that there is balance in the power that the Patriot acts allows. Supporters believe that the Patriot Act has kept us safe and discouraged further terrorist attacks. The Act did not, in any case, accommodate the arrangement of balanced governance that generally protects common freedoms despite such enactment. With all of these capabilities combined, our nation has begun to use what is known as data mining, the mass collection of information about American citizens, to determine who is a threat. Numerous people had their phone metadata obtained by the government and searched for potential illegal activity without their knowledge or permission.