The culpable homicide is murder if the act by which the death is caused is done: 1 with the intention of causing death, 2 with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused, or 3 with the intention of causing such bodily injury as is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, or 4 with the knowledge that it is so imminently dangerous that it must, in all probability, cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury as aforesaid. He read out the statements of P. For ready reference Section 304-B, 498-A I. He told that it is not possible because of engagement of his another daughter Preeti. She denied the suggestion that Manisha committed suicide because they did not accept her marriage with Amit.
In the said note also there is no statement to the effect that she was committing suicide because she had been harassed or tortured by her husband or her in-laws or that she was compelled to end her life because she was being constantly taunted for having not got a car in dowry. He vehemently argued that there was no demand of dowry or harassment or cruelty on account of dowry and no such complaint to any person or authority had ever been made or stated to be made by the parents of the deceased. Aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court, the instant appeal was filed. Above points of similarity are significant and sufficient enough to permit determination of authorship of the disputed items marked as Q1 and Q2 in comparison with the standard writings marked as A1 to A17. Learned counsel for the appellants have not challenged that it was not a dying declaration.
Kamlesh also made several improvements. Perusal of examination in chief of these witnesses shows that no specific time, date, month or event has been mentioned with regard to cruelty and harassment made against the deceased Savita on account of dowry and the allegations levelled are general in nature. Such payments are not enveloped within the ambit of dowry. As per evidence none of these two eye-witnesses admitted him in Hospital. He has given evidence, though, hearsay, but in favour of the defence. As per suicide note Ex.
The Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. A fortiori, an enquiry in this behalf even in a summary way, may be necessary. Therefore, the trial court was right in concluding that the appellants have caused this offence and has rightly convicted them. Vibha Datta Makhija, Advocate who rendered invaluable service as Amicus Curiae in disposal of these appeals. He stated that he used to take rounds during his duty hours. Appellants in reply to the question whether they also wants to say anything have stated the manner in which the incident has actually taken place according to them. Chandra Bhushan Pande and Mr.
Before proceeding further, as per mandate laid down under Section 354 1 b Cr. This principle has a special relevance in cases where in the guilt of the accused is sought to be established by circumstantial evidence. In view of my above discussions of evidence and findings thereon, I find that reasons given by the learned trial court are absolutely illegal and perverse. P-23 to P-39 are the relevant photographs. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty.
The questions may be put at any stage at the discretion of the Court; but they have to be necessarily put at the crucial stage referred to in the section. In the opinion of Medical Board the cause of death was neurogenic shock, coma due to head injury. We have gone through the statement of accused persons some of the accused persons have replied the question no. Deceased Bhawna was keen desirous to have a child due to which she was under depression. P-14 there was no mention that there was any blood on the body of the accused or his clothes.
The need or occasion for such questions arises only if there are any incriminating or adverse circumstances against the accused appearing in the prosecution evidence; but not otherwise. Therefore, his conduct was suggestive of the fact that the offence had been committed by him. This means that giving or agreeing to give any property or valuable security on any of the above three stages should have been in connection with the marriage of the parties. He must constantly inform himself that he cannot afford to have a single moment of laxity or inattentiveness when his leg is on the pedal of a vehicle in locomotion. Accused Raj Kumar Raju used to demand cash for purchase of articles in his shop.
In the meantime, Ram Naresh Singh, Bhupendra Bux Singh, Rakesh Tiwari, Abdul Aziz reached there and saw the incident and immediately gave information of this incident at his house to his son Vijay Pratap Singh. The prosecution has failed to establish the necessary ingredient of dowry deaty i. This will declog the judiciary and subsequent proceedings which otherwise would be an abuse of process of law, will abate. The appellant being in a helpless situation may have been stunned into a shock of disbelief by the death of her husband. Aggrieved, the appellant filed an appeal in the High Court which was dismissed vide impugned judgment and order dated 4. The High Court also observed that the factum of high and reckless speed was evident from the brake marks at the site.