Democracy Causes Ethnic Strife Democracy is not suited for nations comprised of ethnic groups that possess historical differences or grievances aimed at one another. This applies to us too. New Delhi: Government of India. Since it would be less than productive for this paper written for aspiring debaters to merely contain a survey of academic literature surrounding these issues, the approach the authors have chosen here is to examine several key concepts and developments related to democracy to provide a basic framework on which further complexity can be added subsequently. Simply put, direct democracy involves every citizen being involved in the process of governing directly. No need to say about our great roads.
Debate It: Democracy A compilation produced by the Singapore National Team that participated in the 2010 World Schools Debating Championships and International Public Policy Forum Series editor: Benjamin Mak Jia Ming Team Members: Teoh Ren Jie, Adil Hakeem bin Mohammed Rafee, Ng Li Ki and Ashish Xiangyi Kumar Guest contributor: Mr Lee Jia Wei Coach: Mrs Geetha Creffield 1. Where the debate lies 5. The for the , held from April 2014 to May 2014, once again brought back single-party rule in the country, with the being able to claim a majority in the Lok Sabha. Moreover, the issues of modern governance have become excessively complex, way beyond the comprehension of the common man. Degrees of democracy: Some comparative lessons from India. The responsibility to protect and promote socio-economic rights falls mainly within the ambit of individual states and not the government of the Union Ministry of Law and Justice, 2011.
More crucially, these violent movements are principally ineffective at achieving their aims. We get breadcrumbs from our government representatives, and spin from their paid advisors, attempting to convince us what to think is good for us rather acting to fulfill what we the people want and need. But India managed to keep itself as one entity. Under this system, a purely feature-based failure has occurred. Many cases are pending in courts for years.
It helps to play around with the numbers cited above to understand how erroneous expectations have been. The intelligentsia may have a different view in this regard but their grass root inactivism is the reason why the country elects a different leader than their choice. Large spanning continent with diverse lands or a city state or something in between? The debate will be held at. She has done away with untouchability. Irrespective of others we discoverd new ways of showing discontent. As a result, crime is on the rise. Well in times where we discuss what is less evil, democracy is best.
The Head of the Union Cabinet is the Prime Minister. In that case you have no right to complain, because it was a fair and free election. It is subject to regular and constant criticism and popular pressure. That way it is close to the capitalist countries with the difference that there the electorate is educated and highly politically conscious. No potable water, no electrify throughout half the day and worse, no access to life saving drugs, basic healthcare or education. Nations that are in their early stages of economic development should focus on industrialization and free trade, but the pressures of the ballot box and the short-term mindset of an uneducated electorate can force their attention to other issues instead.
Lastly, the very existence of democratic decentralization, 'unity in diversity' is imperiled when regionalism, linguism provincialism, parochialism, or say-separatism raise their heads. In a Jet populated area all candidates would be Jets. At present there are seven national parties and many more state parties. After his downfall in 1998, various Indonesia politicians have implemented short-sighted policies of protectionism and unsustainable populist policies like fuel subsidies. At the political level everyone—ministers, legislators, party officials suffer from it.
Likewise with Opposition, it is important that you be able to choose the appropriate circumstances within which civil disobedience takes place. Indian exports are already showing signs of strain and are falling, partly losing out to other countries which continue to improve their competitiveness, such as China and the Philippines. Through the elections any party may gain simple majority in the lower house. What will the future bring for Guantanamo Bay? Take for example the in India. As readers ponder the concepts associated with democracy and arguments surrounding its controversies, the editor hopes they will examine them not as static notions useful simply for the artificial setting of competitive debate. The democracy was functioning smoothly but in their favor because the masses were illiterate.
No bill introduction in parliament happens. When elected leaders take your opinion far more seriously you take a far greater active interest in the issues that affect you. Important Points to Remember about this Essay: 1. Business magnates too have a stake and have a say in the economic policies as they are the sole financiers of the political parties. I wish to show that the effectiveness of citizenship rights varies considerably within India. Economic and Political Weekly, 46, 40. However, the important point is that this ineffectiveness differs significantly between these states and within India.
It has recovered somewhat, due to the forces of modern information industries managing to confuse the democratically elected regulatory structure- but when democracy recovers, all these gains will of course be lost again. India Human Development Index rose 21 per cent, Kerala tops chart, 21. In all three cases Kerala fares far better than Bihar. All these figures can only be a rough approximation to the actual ineffectiveness of socio-economic rights in the respective states. The real power resides with the Chief Minister equivalent to the Prime Minister and the state council of ministers. Indian Democracy An Essay on Democracy In India It is not feasible for all the people in such a big country like India to take participation in the government.