Concealment of birth by secret disposal of dead body:Whoever, by secretly burying or otherwise disposing of the death body of a child whether such child dies before or after or during its birth, intentionally conceals or endeavours to conceal the birth of such child, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. Being member of unlawful assembly:Whoever, being aware of facts which render any assembly an unlawful assembly, intentionally joins that assembly, or continues in it, is said to be a member of an unlawful assembly. Knowingly joining or continuing in assembly of five or more persons after it has been commanded to disperse. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge. A has committed no offence, though it may turn out that Z was acting in self-defence. Here A has by his own bodily power moved his own person so as to bring it into contact with Z.
In other words, theft would only be robbery if for any of the ends mentioned in a to c the offender voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint or fear of instant death or of instant hurt or instant wrongful restraint. A is guilty of instigating B to commit murder. Karnataka : In Karnataka area except Bellary District Section 294-A repealed 27 of 1957. Over time, she gained the courage to come out and challenge Section 377. And I hereby direct that you be tried by the said Court on the said charge. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge. Delivery of coin as genuine, which, when first possessed, the deliverer did not know to be altered.
That a or b or c have to be read conjunctively with d and e. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge. A common nuisance is not excused on the ground that it causes some convenience or advantage. Offenders sentenced to transportation how dealt with until transported:Repealed by the Code of Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, 1955 26 of 1955 , S. Thug:Whoever, at any time after the passing of this Act, shall have been habitually associated with any other or others for the purpose of committing robbery or child-stealing by means of or accompanied with murder, is a thug.
And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge. Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment:Whoever abets any offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence. Negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter:Whoever does, with fire or any combustible matter, any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, or knowingly or negligently omits to take such order with any fire or any combustible matter in his possession as is sufficient to guard against any probable danger to human life from such fire or combustible matter, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. A is liable in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had instigated the child to put the poison into the food of Y. Here, if A knew that the grievous hurt abetted was likely to cause death, A is liable to be punished with the punishment provided for murder.
Here, A may not have intended to cause death; and may even be sorry that death has been caused by his act; yet, if he knew that he was likely to cause death, he has caused death voluntarily. A is punishable under this section. It could not therefore be taken out of Z's possession, and A has not committed theft, though he may have committed criminal breach of trust. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge. Comments Ingredients The delay in hearing of appeal for long period is no cause for not interfering with an order of acquittal which was based on conjectures and surmises, resulting in gross failure of justice; State of Rajasthan v. On 24 August 2017, the Supreme Court upheld the right to privacy as a fundamental right under the Constitution in the landmark judgement. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge.
Owner or occupier of land on which an unlawful assembly is held:Whenever any unlawful assembly or riot takes place, the owner or occupier of the land upon which such unlawful assembly is held, or such riot is committed, and any person having or claiming an interest in such land, shall be punishable with fine not exceeding one thousand rupees, if he or his agent or manager, knowing that such offence is being or has been committed, or having reason to believe it is likely to be committed, do not give the earliest notice thereof in his or their power to the principal officer at the nearest police-station, and do not, in the case of his or their having reason to believe that it was about to be committed, use all lawful means in his or their power to prevent it, and, in the event of its taking place, do not use all lawful means in his or their power to disperse or suppress the riot or unlawful assembly. It has been extended under Section 5 of the same Act to the Lushai Hills, see Gazette of India, 1898, Pt. This country is known for its freedom, freedom of expression. People cannot consider themselves to be exclusive of a society. National Congress Party created a ruckus in the well of the House, disrupting the proceedings of the Winter Session of the Parliament, calling it political vendetta. But the words which a person uses may give to his gestures or preparation such a meaning as may make those gestures or preparations amount to an assault.
Intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to inform:Whoever, knowing or having reason to believe that an offence has been committed, intentionally omits to give any information respecting that offence which he is legally bound to give, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge. . This offence carries only a fine of Rs 200 and is a bailable offence, which means it is possible for the accused to obtain bail through a bond at the concerned police station. Act causing slight harm:Nothing is an offence by reason that it causes, or that it is intended to cause, or that it is known to be likely to cause, any harm, if that harm is so slight that no person of ordinary sense and temper would complain of such harm. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge. Right of private defence against a deadly assault when there is risk of harm to innocent person:If in the exercise of the right of private defence against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defence extends to the running of that risk.
Here, though the robbery be not committed, A is liable to one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided for that offence, and also to fine. If you require any more information or have any questions, please feel free to contact us by email at Recent changes: Performance Improved Added more translations AppBrain Intelligence premium content Subscribe now to get full and unlimited access to AppBrain Intelligence. Delivery of coin, possessed with knowledge that it is altered:Whoever, having coin in his possession with respect to which the offence defined in Section 246 or 248 has been committed, and having known at the time when he became possessed of such coin that such offence had been committed with respect to it, fraudulently or with intent that fraud may be committed, delivers such coin to any other person, or attempts to induce any other person to receive the same, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge.