For or against animal testing. Against Animal Testing essay 2019-02-06

For or against animal testing Rating: 5,3/10 941 reviews

Persuasive essay against animal testing

for or against animal testing

You can order whatever sort of beagle, rat, pig or mouse to mention a few that your laboratory wants to test on. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. They also contend that other species are different enough from people to make it ethically acceptable to use them in experiments. Some believe that the goals of this type of testing are not significant. Secrecy and security have ensured that people are unaware of what happens behind the laboratory doors or wrongly trust that the laws intended to prohibit cruelty to animals include protection for animals used in research. The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animals received tests for substances that will never actually see approval or public consumption and use.

Next

Avoiding Animal Testing

for or against animal testing

Therefore, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of products. It may be an indulgence for us, but the theobromine present in chocolate can induce vomiting in dogs; not too different from what aspirin does to a cat. They are simply our effort to review and raise awareness of the underlying issues. It wastes money and resources and sidetracks meaningful scientific progress. Still Fighting Against Animal Testing At Lush, we believe in buying ingredients only from companies that do not commission tests on animals and in testing our products on humans.

Next

Still Fighting Against Animal Testing

for or against animal testing

Others argue that while it is wrong to unnecessarily abuse animals, animal experimentation must continue because of the enormous scientific resource that provide. For example , fruit flies, and plants would be preferred over mammals. The procedures are cruel, unreliable, and harmful. To make the condition of this practice worse, this experiments are not only used to find medical solutions that can save human lives but they are widely used in cosmetics testing Food and Drug Administration 47. It is instructive to note that of all substances tested in animals and that appear promising at first glance fail clinical trials.

Next

Arguments against animal testing

for or against animal testing

Luckily there are more humane alternatives that… 1237 Words 5 Pages Zoee Gaige-Wilson Persuasive Speech Outline I. Animal testing is big business, worth over in the European Union and this is only 28% of the world market. Plastic models and computers can effectively substitute use of animals in experiments. All cosmetics companies can adopt these kinds of cruelty-free testing methods. They do not represent every possible argument, or even necessarily the best arguments. Many animal rights advocates argue similarly—that just because we are human is not sufficient grounds to declare animals less morally significant. The results were ; the objective of the tests was clearly set out in less than 60% of the studies.

Next

Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing

for or against animal testing

We have only affordable prices for you, and we offer a quality service. Peter Singer is one of the best publicly known advocates of animal rights and animal equality. So when it comes to finding cures for the many maladies that affect us, we need to conduct a lot of research to provide cutting-edge healthcare. Image 2: People needlessly injecting, probing, and torturing defenseless animals. Those who disagree with animal testing claim that it is harmful, cruel and scientifically lacking practice. Discriminating against animals because they do not have the cognitive ability, language, or moral judgment that humans do is no more justifiable than discriminating against human beings with severe mental impairments. Cohen, Andrew and Wellman, Christopher eds.

Next

Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing

for or against animal testing

Anything goes, as far as protecting human life is concerned, isn't it? Extensive literature searches, for instance, can ensure that experiments are not unnecessarily replicated and can ensure that are only used to obtain information not already available in the scientific community. They gave their lives for nothing! Animal testing — taken here to mean the use of animals in research for the purpose of furthering human concerns such as drug efficacy and the safety of products such as cosmetics — is an endeavor fraught with controversy and difficult ethical arguments. Total animals killed in research annually: 19. Luckily there are more humane alternatives that have also proved to be less expensive. Studying cell cultures in a petri dish, while sometimes useful, does not provide the opportunity to study interrelated processes occurring in the central nervous system, endocrine system, and immune system. As the title indicates, this article focuses on the negative aspects of animal testing, such as the cost, the lack of protection for animals, and the fact that some tests are, in the end, simply pointless.

Next

Pros & Cons of Animal Testing

for or against animal testing

My purpose today is to tell you about the truths of animal testing; what animal tesing is, how unreliable the data is in animal testing, and alternatives to animal testing that would save many lives of animals that could be going to a new home and not a lab for research. Only 6% of 4,300 international companies involved in drug development have registered a new drug with the U. Some people argue that all animal experimentation should end because it is wrong to treat animals merely as tools for furthering knowledge. These are a few things that happen to animals that are used for research and although animal research has helped to find cures for some virisus, such as polio, there are more efficient and ethical ways to do so that do not involve the suffering of innocent creatures. Those against animal testing believe that alternative such as cellular or computer models are sufficient enough to replace. For instance, we have this drug that has been safely tested on animals.

Next

The Cruelty and Waste of Animal Experimentation

for or against animal testing

Over 6 million animals suffer in tests there every year but these tests lead to no more than 12 new products every year, many more clear animal trials but fail in the human clinical stage of the process. However, animal experimentation in medical research and cosmetics testing cannot be justified on the basis that animals are lower on the evolutionary chart than humans since animals resemble humans in so many ways. Nor does it reflect the tragedy of each individual life—however short and brutal—caged in an artificial environment which deprives them of experiencing life as nature intended. Introduction Animals can be ferocious and wild, but they can also be gentle and tame. No matter how much loving pet owners will enjoy anthropomorphizing their pets or how we admire the intelligence of elephants, whales, dolphins and primates it is an unavoidable fact that we are very different and our bodies and minds work in a different way to those of even our closest living relatives. Testing on monkeys at 500 times the dose given to the volunteers totally failed to predict the dangerous side effects.


Next