Divine right theory of state. Divine right theory legal definition of Divine right theory 2019-02-16
Divine right theory of state Rating:
9,9/10
1853
reviews
Divine right of kings
Each man was only assecure as his own power and mental awareness could make him. Although the Idealist philosophers used this theory for the glorification of the state, yet in practical sense since state is represented by the Government or a King, it inevitably lends divine authority kings. The theory is considered as dangerous, as it allowed monarchs to have unlimited power. The system of private property worked as a potential cause of the rise of state. Does it mean the whole population of the state? According to the divine right theory, any attempt to overthrow the king, limit his powers or go against his will in any way was sacrilege, as it was also an act against God himself.
Divine right theory legal definition of Divine right theory
The Pope of Rome till the early Middle ages, combined in him both spiritual and political authority. The classes, on the other hand, cooperated with each other and contributed in their way in the composite development of the state. Criticism of Theory: The social contract theory is strongly denounced on the following grounds. Second Bonaparte took this drastic step not for the general betterment of civil society but for his own sake, to satisfy his own desire for more power. This necessitates establishment of civil society. According to Engels the bourgeois class does not wither away but is abolished by the proletariat in the course of revolution. As the ruler was the deputy of God, obedience to him was held to be a religious duty and resistance a sin.
Many would say that this idea is selfish and thoughtless. Most modern political scientists believe that it is too much to believe that God decided to create the state after thinking about it. The state generally adopts those policies and tries to implement those schemes which will produce favourable results in the long run and will serve the purpose of the state as well as that of the bourgeoisie in a better and effective way. Since the theory of Divine Original defended absolute authority, the democrats all the world over attacked from right and left. Some critics, for the above reason, have argued that Marx in various ways supported reforms. The indication was that the disloyal people might take shelter in America which was an empty place at that time.
With the growth of age, status lost its rigour of fixity and its place was taken by contractual obligations. But its existence cannot be ruled out. It was universally popular among the early people. Essentially, the people are responsible for creating the government to aid them in their interest, therefore if the government violates it's purpose, working in its own self-interest, or against the interest of the people, then the 'social contract' is void, and the people can take away from it the … power they gave to it. That is the dominant class is to be thrown from power and this can be done through revolution. The proletarians will smash this state.
Divine right theory legal definition of Divine right theory
According to the Jews, the King is treated owing responsibility to God alone for his acts. The theory of Divine Right meant that the King ruled because God placed him on the throne. Divine Origin Theory: The Genesis of Divine Origin Theory: The oldest theory about the origin of the state is the divine origin theory. It was under these circumstances that God appointed the king to rule the people. A fifth boon of this theory of consent was constitutional experiments in several countries. The theory of Divine Right meant that the King ruled because God placed him on the throne. When the proletarians seized political power and did away the class structure and after that established a class-less society which is also called communism the utility of state as an instrument of class rule and exploitation ended.
The theory of the Divine Right of Kings, originally used in the Middle Ages to serve as a bulwark against the claims of the Church Fathers, was later used by Kings and their supporters to defend their existence against the political consciousness of the people when the people claimed that ultimately power and sovereign authority rested with them. The King could not be held answerable for his actions to human judgment. Such a form of government is antagonistic to the democratic ideal which accepts consent as the basis of the State. The capitalist class is quite conscious of the fact that if it fails to convince the general mass of the so called benefits of the bourgeois rule agitation is bound to arise. Even the concept of state was unknown to the people of this phase. Here by civil society Marx and Engels have meant numerous organisations and institutions and the social, political, economic, cultural aspects of society. What this demonstrates most strongly, though, is that there was an idea that the ultimate root of kingly authority was spiritual.
In such states, it is important for both the leaders and the rest of the population to follow the stipulations in the constitution, which is drawn up by both parties. What three philosophers were most influential to the beginnings of American Government? We may say with certainty that the enlightened public opinion of a state is the general will of Rousseau. The nature-made laws were replaced by man-made laws. The origin of the state is shrouded in mystery. This concept was formulated to dispel any possibility of papal and ecclesiastical claims to supremacy in secular as well as spiritual matters. It is clear, then, that - as James stated - kings are God's lieutenants on earth.
All these led to a situation which necessitated a state structure. In the third place, the emergence of democracy was a big blow for the autocratic dogma of mixing religion with politics and thereby it blunted the edge of identifying God with the King. In the medieval period the Christians held the Pope in semi-God status. Now we shall draw up the criticism of it. There is a controversy about the instrumentalist approach and the relative autonomy approach. The bourgeoisie universalises the objective and ideas and also rationalises them. True justice was administered according to what Shastras would say.
In subsequent regimes the state as an instrument of exploitation did not lose its importance. The result was that the secular theorists of the social contract reversed the process of choice. Not only Britain, France was also a capitalist country and the conditions of workers in that country were not better at all. He decided he had the divine right to do just what he liked, as he had been appointed directly by God. On Day 7 he was pleased with his work and decided to rest, marking the beginning of the Sabbath.
